Legal Law admin  

Why gun control has nothing to do with the second amendment

The Second Amendment clearly states that United States citizens have the right to “keep and bear arms” for “traditionally lawful purposes.” But while the goal of the Second Amendment is noble, this right, as is evident in the many cases of murder in both urban and rural areas of the country, can be abused especially by reckless (and even mentally unstable) individuals.

Recently, two mass shooting incidents shocked the nation and drew sympathy from many countries around the world. Whether these shooting incidents can be classified as hate crimes or have other unexplained reasons, the fact remains that several innocent people were brutally murdered due to the irresponsible use of firearms.

Because of this, concerned and law-abiding citizens and legislators are constantly debating an age-old issue of whether or not the public should be allowed to carry guns. People who don’t support the idea of ​​gun regulations say these measures are a blatant violation of the constitutional rights of all Americans. Proponents of this idea, on the other hand, argue that the basic idea of ​​gun control laws is plain and simple, and that is responsible firearm ownership.

Illinois is one of several states that began implementing gun control restrictions as early as the 1970s. But because these laws run counter to the Second Amendment, the state has consistently faced legal challenges over these restrictions. And many times, these laws have been overturned and abolished. For example, sometime in 2010, the Supreme Court struck down the state’s firearms ban because it was deemed illegal and unconstitutional.

But while it’s true that the Second Amendment can powerfully do away with all gun control laws in the country, people who oppose these laws miss the point. These gun laws are not an attack on the Second Amendment. They are much more, and this is what they are prepared to achieve.

Gun laws try to regulate the use of firearms in all parts of the country for the sake of public safety. When we say “regular”, it can have a variety of meanings. For example, before a person is allowed to buy a gun, part of the gun control legislation may require that person to receive the proper training. A person can lose control of himself and may resort to destructive means, especially when he is overwhelmed by an intense feeling of anger. So, to ensure that irresponsible use of firearms is prevented, proper training in the handling and use of firearms cannot be overemphasized.

On top of that, these gun control laws are meant to make sure that everyone obtains their firearms legally. With the continuing threat of terrorism, it pays to have a system in place to correct any unauthorized dealing and use of firearms.

Leave A Comment